Shostakovich – piano concerto in F minor

Our music for this week is the second movement (andante) from Shostakovich’s piano concerto in F minor.
This concerto has unfortunately received a significant amount of criticism because of its light-hearted first and third movements, which have been labeled as nursery rhymes unworthy for high level performance. The second movement, however, has received only admiration and praise. Many notable critics, composers, conductors, and musicians have heralded it as the most gut-wrenchingly beautiful piece of music they have ever heard. Shostakovich pulls out all the stops, so to speak, in creating music that is incredibly lyrical, yet also hauntingly reminiscent of the times in which Shostakovich lived. The piano is accompanied by the entire orchestra, but the strings are utilized especially heavily. This is particularly apparent in the first few bars, where the strings move through a breathtaking chorale before the piano’s startlingly beautiful entrance nearly a quarter of the way into the piece.
Shostakovich, a Russian, composed the work in 1957. The shadows of Soviet Russia pervade the music from its first notes. Even the astoundingly beautiful melodies of the second movement do not escape its reach. One can hear the despair, the pain, and the suffering that came with the Soviet era in Russia’s history in the way that Shostakovich utilizes harmonic tension between the strings and the brass. For me, it evokes images of rural Hungary that were implanted on my mind when I traveled to that country during my senior year of high school. There too, the shadow of the Soviet rule was heavy on the land. It manifested itself in run-down villages, an aged population with a dying language, farming villages with outdated machinery, and cities full of modern structures surrounding the select few heritage buildings that escaped destruction. Perhaps Shostakovich had other images in mind when he was writing this work, but the influence of the era is unmistakable. I prefer the words of one critic who referred to the second movement as “tender with a touch of melancholy.”
Enjoy!

Archangelo Corelli – Christmas Concerto

Hello all,

Our music for this week is the Christmas Concerto by Archangelo Corelli. You may have expected me to send out the “Hallelujah” Chorus from Handel’s Messiah, but the Messiah is not actually Christmas music. That famous chorus is actually an Easter composition. This concerto by Corelli, however, was written for the Christmas season and should be a Christmas-time staple for all of us.

It is interesting to note that this concerto broke from the tradition of Corelli’s era, which was predominantly based on small ensembles with four movements in a concerto. Corelli expanded the number of instruments involved, added two movements, and even threw in a very unusual 12/8 meter for the last movement. The movements rotate back and forth between relaxed adagios and active allegros, and Corelli never fails (in true violinist fashion) to feature plenty of solo lines for the first violinist. The movement to pay special attention to is the last movement, the Pastorale. Many critics consider this movement to be the most famous and beautiful of all Corelli’s compositions, and I am inclined to agree. It is one of the most serene and welcoming pieces I’ve played; it emanates gratitude and peace.

 

 

Enjoy and Merry Christmas!

 

Opera!

Our music for today comes from Mozart’s opera Idomeneo.

(This link is just the Overture, but feel free to explore the rest of the opera through the adjoining links)

Despite it’s grand proportions, the opera is written in the surprisingly simple “sonata form.” If you’ve been receiving these emails for a while now, you may remember that we’ve come across this format several times before. The format is very straightforward: “Exposition – Development – Recapitulation.” Mozart utilizes sonata form not only with the melodies in the opera but also the tonal centers. For instance, you will recognize melodies from the opening scenes of the opera when you listen to the finale few scenes of the opera, but what you may not immediately realize is that Mozart also brings back the exact same tonal framework as well. The opening is in D Major; the development goes through A Major (the dominant key) and several other modulations and then returns to D Major. Listen for recurring themes, but be ready for Mozart to surprise you with an unexpected transition and make you wait a bit longer for the final recapitulation.

The story of Idomeneo comes from a Greek myth by the same name. It takes place on the Island of Crete, where Ilia, the daughter of Troy’s defeated King Priam, now lives. She is in love with Idamante, the son of the Cretan king Idomeneo, and is fiercely jealous of another of his lovers named Electra. Idomeneo goes to war and is heard to have been lost at sea; unbeknownst to the Cretans, he has been rescued by Neptune, the god of the sea, and has been washed up on a Cretan beach on the other side of the island. In a moment of overwhelmed thankfulness to Neptune, Idomeneo promises to sacrifice the first living creature he sees. Tragically, his son Idamante approaches him first. However, before Idomeneo can fulfill his vow and sacrifice his son, Ilia offers herself in Idamante’s place. The god Neptune is touched by this act of sacrificial love and bestows the kingdom of Crete upon Idamante and Ilia as king and queen.

Enjoy!

 

Beethoven Sonata No. 4 for Violin and Piano

Our music for this week is the Sonata No. 4 for Violin and Piano by Beethoven, performed by the German violinist Augustin Hadelich and American pianist Charles Owen.

This fourth violin and piano sonata of Beethoven’s was actually the only one that did not receive scathing negative reviews from the public. I find that hard to believe, given the timeless melody that we all know from the famous “Spring” sonata. However, the sonata is unique in that it does not follow a conventional sonata layout. While most sonatas start with a moderate-tempo movement, move to a slow movement, and finish with some sort of Allegro or Presto, this sonata starts with a Presto, moves to a moderate-tempo movement that also includes some faster passages, and ends with yet another fast Allegro. Even more interesting is the inscription that Beethoven put inside the first page of the manuscript: “For the pianoforte with the accompaniment of the violin.” We have come to view these sonatas as violin compositions with the piano as an accompaniment, but Beethoven envisioned them as piano sonatas with the violin as the accompaniment. I think Hadelich does a masterful job of staying true to Beethoven’s wishes on this point. You may notice that the sound he uses is a softer, more mature sound that nicely complements the active piano part. He is not afraid to blend into the background (as much as that is possible in a duet) and has a remarkable ability to make even a melody line sound like a partnership rather than a solo. This is one of the marks of a truly top-notch musician – that they do not need to be the soloist for you to recognize their mastery.

Enjoy!

 

A Classic

Our music this week is Mendelssohn’s “Hebrides” Overture.

My first memory of this piece comes from Kinhaven Institute of Music in rural Vermont, where I spent four weeks during the summer of 2005. I was a homesick ten-year-old, and I didn’t enjoy very much of the summer except for the few hours a week we spent in orchestra rehearsal playing the “Hebridies” overture.

The Hebrides Overture was written by a 20-year-old Felix Mendelssohn in 1830 while he was touring Europe with the London Philharmonic Orchestra. After performing in London’s Wigmore Hall, he took a short trip to Scotland with his friend Karl. This small excursion turned out to be one of the most impactful events of his life. He was overwhelmed by the beauty of the Scottish landscape and the richness of the Scottish cultural heritage. After lodging for a few nights on a peninsula in the Inner Hebrides islands off the western coast of Scotland, he conceived the melody of the overture you will hear. (Mendelssohn’s famous Scottish Symphony was also a result of this trip). Despite ample inspiration for the composition, Mendelssohn belabored over the work for over two years before he published it. He wrote to his sister that he was not happy with it at first because it did not give one enough of an impression of “oil and seagulls and dead fish.” Dead fish aside, the opening theme of the Hebrides overture remains a timeless and unforgettable fixture of classical music.

Listen for the sounds of the ocean at the beginning of the overture. They’re hard to miss. The rolling waves are reflected in the deep, undulating swells of the cellos and basses and the lonely seagulls are portrayed by the thinly textured violins. The woodwinds give us the haunting main melody and the brass join later on when Mendelssohn is depicting a storm on the ocean. For those of you who may have played this piece or others like it, it may be interesting to note that the structure of the work is simply sonata form. Listen for a development section that utilizes a secondary melody played by the cellos and bassoons, as well as a recapitulation of the original theme at the end in the strings.

Enjoy!

 

Pushing Boundaries

Hello all,

Our music for this week is Bohuslav Martinu’s Violin Concerto No. 2 in G Minor, performed by the German virtuoso Julia Fischer. We still have one more week of Ravel before we move onto a new series, but I wanted to share this with you after hearing it for the first time this week.

 

This music is meant to stretch your conception of classical music into the more flexible dimensions that 20th century composers utilized. You will hear modern melodic elements in this work, as well as French Impressionist flavors, which happened to be a stylistic preference of Martinu. It is also interesting to note that Martinu incorporated a polyphonic style akin to that of the great Baroque composer J.S. Bach into this work. In addition, you will hear elements that mimic the war-like madness that is often found in compositions by Shostakovich and other composers of this era. This is largely due to the very personal experiences with war that Martinu and other Eastern European composers had; only two years before this work was written, he and his wife fled their Czech homeland and left Europe through France with one day to spare before German tanks overran their hometown.

The work was written in 1943 and premiered that year by the great Jewish violinist Mischa Elman with the Boston Symphony Orchestra. Elman had apparently heard Martinu’s 1st Symphony performed a few years earlier and had been so impressed with it that he requested that Martinu write him a violin concerto to perform. Martinu, who was apparently a constantly cheerful and happy individual, gleefully agreed and asked Martinu to play a recital at his home so that he could understand the violinist’s stylistic and technical preferences. The strong element of lyricism that can be heard throughout the piece was an intentional addition by Martinu, who felt that Elman’s best asset as a violinist was his ability to display heartfelt lyricism.

At the time of its premier, it was thought to the only violin concerto of Martinu, but after the composer’s death an earlier concerto was found in his older manuscripts. It is strange to think that this violin concerto, composed at the exact same time as the much more well-known concerti of Shostakovich and Prokofiev, is almost completely unknown in today’s violin repertoire.

Enjoy!

T

P.S. A listening tip – you’ll find the main melody of the first movement around the 3-minute mark 🙂

 

An amazing discovery

We’ll be listening this week to Arnold Schoenberg’s Verklarte Nacht (Transfigured Night). The piece has become somewhat of an obsession for me. I listen to it nearly every day and show no signs of stopping. Some might say I need an intervention. But before you become too alarmed at my (admittedly shaky) mental state, you must listen this incredible piece.

I have always been a fan of Schoenberg. My teacher Eva Gruesser, who played as the first violinist of the famed Lark Quartet, released a masterful recording of Schoenberg’s string quartet (which I would highly recommend you listen to). Schoenberg bridges the gap between Romantic and Modern music like no other composer. Whereas Ravel and his explorations in Impressionism are clearly on the Romantic side of things and Shostakovich is undoubtedly a Modern era composer, Schoenberg can’t seem to decide. For instance, the passages around 4 and 7 minutes into the piece are shockingly modern while the melody at minute 17 could have been written by a teenage Felix Mendelssohn in 1860. A critic from the LA Philharmonic described it best: “Lush, dense, highly chromatic yet still just within the bounds of tonality, it can be regarded as a very late example of 19th century German Romanticism, a natural product of the trajectory from Beethoven and Schubert to Brahms, Wagner, and Strauss.”

Schoenberg wrote Verklarte Nacht in 1899 at the ripe old age of 25, perhaps reminiscient of a modern-day Mozart. It became his “jumping-off point” into a complex and fascinating exploration of atonal music and twelve-tone composition (commonly referred to as “serialism”) that would consume the rest of his life. Most of his colleagues and today’s historians are of the opinion that Schoenberg was a true genius; contemporaries wrote about his voracious intellect that was utterly impenetrable with even the most carefully prepared argument.

Verklärte Nacht is based on a poem by Richard Dehmel that was written in 1896. You may notice that the work does not have any movements, reflecting the structure of an actual poem and making Verklart Nacht one of the few legitimate tone poems in existence. In the poem, a man and a woman walk through the forest at night and speak of their unborn child, who, despite being conceived by another man, has their complete devotion. Over the course of the poem, the couple and the unborn child go through a transfiguration – from dark to light, sadness to joy, struggle to freedom. The poem reflects this by beginning with the following line – “Two people walk through a bare, cold grove” – and ending with “Two people walk through the lofty, bright night.” Schoenberg’s music reflects this change with incredible accuracy. He opens the work with brooding, dark tones in the cellos and violas and ends it in a violin solo that carries a sense of gratitude and grace. It can also be seen in the tonal transition from the key of D Minor to the key of D Major that occurs about halfway through the piece. This is powerful music. It is nuanced, invigorating, and impossibly dense; it is refined, forceful, and unflinchingly confident; it is relentlessly honest.

Many of the pieces of music I send out are chosen so that you can listen to them while you’re working or doing something else. This piece is not one of those. This is meant to be intently listened to, multiple times, with focused attention. It is simply too complex and too masterful a work of art to be relegated to the role of background music. (Save that for Handel and Haydn – I mean, come on, who likes them anyway?) 😉

Enjoy!

 

Ravel #5

Hello all,

To finish our series on the music of Maurice Ravel, we’re listening to his most famous composition.

Ravel initially composed Bolero as part of a ballet that was commissioned to him by the Russian ballerina Ida Rubenstein, who had asked him to write an orchestral overture based on a set of piano suites by the baroque composer Isaac Albeniz. However, Ravel discovered that there were copyright restrictions on Albeniz’s work that prohibited him from doing so. Without informing Rubenstein, he went ahead and composed something of his own creation based on the Spanish bolero dance form. Rubenstein was delighted, as was the Paris audience at its world premiere. It immediately become Ravel’s best-loved composition.

You will notice that the piece is very simple. It is in the simplest key (C Major), contains the simplest dynamic structure (one long crescendo from pianissimo to fortissimo), and features one simple melody that is based on – of all things – the snare drum. There are two primary melodies, the second of which incorporates some of the jazz elements that we’ve seen Ravel utilize on other occasions. Throughout the entire piece, the tension between the snare drum and the lyrical melody (usually in the woodwinds) increases with the dynamic buildup. Every time the melody comes around, a new element is added to the orchestra that increases the density and maturity of the sound. Ravel passes the melody through the flute, the clarinet, the oboe, the bassoon, the E-flat clarinet, the trumpet, the saxophone, the horns, the English horn, the trombone, the first violins, and numerous combinations of these instruments. I find this piece particularly interesting because it offers a unique perspective on the ways that a single instrument can affect the whole of an ensemble.

You will also notice that despite the steady increase in dynamic, the tempo never changes. Ravel happened to be extraordinarily particular about this aspect of the piece, and more than one conductor endured his wrath when they let the orchestra speed up the tempo near the end of the piece. Ravel’s reasoning was that he wanted the listener to focus on the unique change in texture that each instrument brought to the music. So, in the interest of avoiding Ravel’s anger, I would recommend that you listen carefully for the ways in which each cycle of the melody is different. What instruments are added? What do they bring to the table? How is this cycle different than the last?

Enjoy!

T

 

Ravel’s inspiration

Hello all,

I mentioned in last week’s email that Claude Debussy was one of the primary influences on Ravel’s musical development. Debussy’s place in French Impressionist music can hardly be overstated. In many ways, Debussy created the foundation for Ravel’s success. I thought it might therefore be good for us to listen to some Debussy in order to better understand Ravel’s music.

This composition is titled “La Cathedrale Engloutie,” meaning “The Sunken Cathedral.” It is a perfect example of what Debussy referred to as Musical Impressionism. In many ways, Debussy can be viewed as the Eduard Manet of music. He, like Manet, laid the framework for the Impressionist movement that was later developed by a new generation of artists. Manet’s hard work in promoting Impressionist art was central to the success of later artists like Delacroix and Monet; similarly, Debussy’s development of the harmonic framework for Impressionist music paved the way for composers like Ravel. In short, musical impressionism uses music to create a allusion to or rough depiction of an idea or story. Debussy simply named each piece after the idea or object it was meant to represent and then left it to the listener to discover how it did so.

La Cathédrale Engloutie is based on an ancient Breton myth about a cathedral that is submerged underwater near a mythical island called Ys. On calm, clear mornings, the cathedral supposedly rises up out of the ocean’s still waters. When it does so, the sounds of bells ringing, priests chanting, and organs playing can be heard across the sea. Debussy uses the variety of techniques available on the piano to represent each of these sounds. For instance, the opening of the piece is written in a circling, wave-like pattern, which symbolizes the waves of the ocean lapping at the base of the cathedral as it rises out of the water. The opening of the work is mysterious and dense, in keeping with Debussy’s written instructions to imitate the effects of fog. Once the cathedral has emerged, the pianist thunders across the keyboard with full power and pedaling in an imitation of the grandeur and majesty of the organ. As the cathedral sinks back into the sea, the organ-esque melodies can still be heard but at a softer dynamic, representing the underwater element at play in the piece. Throughout the piece – and especially at the end – Debussy includes moments in which the pianist instantly releases a pedaled note, creating the impression of a ringing bell. These bell sounds are what the piece ends with, albeit in a muted fashion reminiscent of their underwater residence

Enjoy!

 

Ravel #4

We’re returning to our series on the music of French Impressionist composer Maurice Ravel. The piece you will hear is Ravel’s String Quartet in F.
While studying music in New York City in the summer of 2012, I performed this quartet with three other students, all of whom had travelled from China. We were very fortunate to have the opportunity to perform it in the penthouse of the Lincoln Center in downtown NYC, with the floor-to-ceiling windows giving us a view of the sparkling city spreading out beneath us as we serenaded the audience with the breathtaking opening movement. Every time I hear this piece, I picture that moment. It felt like we floating over the city on Ravel’s melodies.
Ravel wrote the string quartet in the 1920’s in an attempt to imitate the colors created by Debussy’s fantastic G Minor string quartet. (I highly recommend that you also listen to the Emerson Quartet’s phenomenal recording of the the Debussy). Immediately after the quartet’s premiere, the audience (and soon the entire world) fell in love with Ravel’s music and heralded him as the greatest composer of the 20th century. However, the world-famous Paris Conservatory, where he was a student at the time, was not pleased with such a proclamation. The harmonic and stylistic liberties that Ravel had taken in his string quartet proved to be too much for that archaic fortress of Romanticism, and the Conservatory faculty promptly expelled Ravel. He happily departed and proceeded to garner worldwide fame as a ground-breaking composer, much to the chagrin of his former professors. (Legend has it that even the great Debussy, Ravel’s mentor and idol, was so enamored with the string quartet that he wrote to Ravel specifically to tell him not to change a single note of what he had written because it was already perfect).
The first movement is one of the most iconic and beautiful melodies in the entire chamber music repertoire. It is impossible to miss and just as impossible to forget. It is at once exquisitely Parisian and modestly homey. The Hagen Quartet (the ensemble in the video above) does a masterful job of accenting all of the delightful nuances of the movement. The second movement reflects Ravel’s fascination with all things “Far Eastern,” as it contrasts the first movement with sporadic pizzicato passages and almost hysterically rushed virtuosity. The third movement is the reflective movement, and it recapitulates the melodies introduced in the first movement to give us a reminiscent, almost nostalgic experience. The fourth movement incorporates all the themes introduced thus far into a majestic yet pensive finale.
For not being a string musician, Ravel displays a remarkable depth of understanding of the possibilities offered by the violin, viola, and cello. He knows just which melodies, lines, runs, and techniques work best on which instrument. For instance, when a melancholy melody comes along in the third movement, he uses the viola’s sombre tones to display it. When a lyrical theme sweeps through the first movement, he uses a dialogue between the two violins in order to capitalize on their lighter tones. During the second movement’s deep and powerful currents, the cello is used to give the music density and urgency. Listen for the ways that Ravel uses the techniques and characteristics of each instrument to create different styles and textures of sound.
Enjoy!
T
P.S. The link above is only for the first movement. To listen to the other movements, just click on the subsequent videos in the menu/sidebar to the right of the screen.
P.P.S. Don’t forget to check out our playlist on Spotify! It’s under the name “Music Email Playlist” and contains over 14 hours of music – every piece that’s ever been sent out!